Don't neglect your site's content
Many today make the mistake of writing for SEO, key-wording the content for Google. Don't, says John Loudon who makes the case for well-written content
During my time building web applications, blogs and many other forms of media I have witnessed a neglect, a misunderstanding about the importance of the written word. It is said that ‘content is king’ but do business owners and indeed their employees grasp the weight that content holds?
I was recently asked by a client to design several web pages prior to being sent content. This troubled me for several reasons:
- It meant that the client thought I could predict what the ‘core’ intention of the page was, and while that is possible it’s an oversight. Content can never work for the end user if the designers are ‘guessing’ their way through it
- It also meant they did not give the site any value for selling the product
- It displays an oversight or worse ‘assumption’ that the customers who will be looking at the site are too stupid to see beyond the pretty pictures
Content has to be not only well written, but also be structured with the right language and tone. It has to do the selling work for the site. I would put forward the following as a few key drivers to outlaying ‘great’ content.
- Treat your content like a phone call – short, snappy, jargon free and to the point. Like phone calls content should have a ‘purpose’ – what are your trying to tell me?
- Before you write anything ‘think’ – it seems obvious but so many don’t think it out before they start typing. This content is one of the main points of sale; a chance to explain. The content should direct the users where to go, let them know what to do and set the expectations for them. It should NOT baffle them, confuse or frustrate them. So plan your content, write out what you would like it to achieve, one or two tasks per block - no more. Then write your first draft. This next bit is important:
- Forget what you know about your company, imagine yourself as a new user and read what you have just written from that point of view, think about it as another business if it helps. Then ask yourself the following:
a) Is it easy to understand what’s being said?
b) Is it interesting? Do you want to read more?
c) Does it carry a down to earth tone, but importantly does it still remain professional?
d) Lastly if your job depended on this one page of content would you risk publishing it?
If you can answer all of these with ‘yes’ and you can tweak the content, then you have decent if not great content. Remember – clients are people like you, they like sensible, down to earth content and language – no one likes waffle. If it's realms of text, they will switch off. Make it interesting.
Many today make the mistake of writing for SEO, key wording the content for Google – don’t! The site may get to number one but the content will look like it’s been written by a five year old. Instead write it for humans. If it's good content to read and keeps to a set topic, it will still perform well but more importantly it will be far more likely to convert into a subscription or sale.
Conclusion
Write the sort of content you like to read yourself. Ensure you read and then reread your work. Don’t rush/skim it. Think about it from a new user's point of view. Make it engaging. Short and snappy beats academic lecture. Get creative, break your content up with ideas (the designer can easily build on this if there is a well thought-out concept/content strategy).
Finally be yourself – you are not a robot or some keyword happy lunatic when you speak (I hope), so you should be like this when you write.




5 comments
Comment: 1
Cheers,
Sarah Bauer
Navigator Multimedia
Comment: 2
With this client it was during the discovery process that it was mentioned:
“I will leave it to the designer to determine the look and feel and then I will send my content over”
I made a strong case for not approaching the project like this. A good exercise (I find) for getting the content is to talk through the site structure with them - after you know their needs (This also helps you get the scope of the project/ work out costing) you can form a list (probably in Excel) and check it off as you receive it. I know some designers that won’t work until all content is received! I am not quite that evil but I definitely prefer it to be sensible chunks of content rather than an email per page scenario.
My approach is to try and support them through the process and make suggestions to enhance or streamline the content itself. There is always the option of teaming up with a professional copy writer which is something I have considered with some projects. A common way I put it to my clients is pointing out that they are the expert and the business owner and therefore will always know best as how to speak about their company. I can take the content, offer suggestions, build on it, add prominence or tweaks to make it look or perform better but I can’t build a site generic for all forms of content – if it’s a basic blog maybe, but most sites will have custom layouts to suit what they are trying to showcase.
I think one of the reasons why we get into this scenario in our industry is due to clients being used to paying for services that work as: ( pay > receive > move on ) as opposed to the collaborative process that we are used to. You could forgive them for assuming you would write their content or build it “pretty” for content to be dropped in – the latter happens far too often across the web and gives a false impression of what a web designer is employed for.
Cheers,
John
Comment: 3
Comment: 4
I like the idea of negotiating the authority of content as pertaining to the client's expertise, and guiding them towards understanding the responsibility they have to "speak about their company" first. Takes an extra bit of client-designer dialogue, but will certainly be worth it in the process of creating more collaborative relationships ( rather than the pay>receive>move on model we see now).
Cheers,
Sarah
Comment: 5