UX design not "better" than visual design
Clearleft MD argues that visual designers should not feel diminished

Clearleft MD Andy Budd is concerned that visual designers are having an identity crisis, feeling undervalued and wrongly convincing themselves to rebrand as UX designers. In an article for his blog, Budd argues that each area of design is important and that you don't need to become a UX designer in order to 'grow' or move to the next level.
Budd told .net that he wrote the article because he's over the past year seen an increasing number of designers calling themselves UX designers under various mistaken beliefs. "There's a lot of misunderstanding about what UX design actually is, being given by ill-informed articles and sound-bite conference talks that present a very light and fluffy version," he says.
"This has led to a lot of junior and intermediate designers latching on to the idea that UX design is the 'next big thing', and a way to make very large amounts of money." Budd adds that he sees people changing their titles to user experience designer, talking a bit about usability and thinking they're suddenly user experience designers. "I want to try and tell everyone that UX design and visual design are very separate things."
Budd is particularly keen to point out that any belief that UX is a step up the ladder is a misconception: "I've been coming across lots of designers, through job adverts and conferences, finding a frustration that they don’t know what to do next, to further their careers. And the natural assumption is they need to start working on UX design, learning how to wireframe and prototype, do usability testing and IA."
This isn't, Budd argues, the case: "I don’t think user experience is a 'higher' level of design that you can step up to. You don’t start out as a graphic designer, go ‘professional’ and become a user experience designer." He argues that graphic design is an important skill of its own that requires plenty of knowledge and dedication, and that any graphic designers thinking they're somehow lesser than UX designers have it wrong.
"Someone should never be afraid or ashamed of being a graphic designer. It’s not that they’ve failed somehow. Graphic designers are just as valuable. You shouldn’t feel diminished or inferior because you’re not a UX designer, or think that you have lower-level skills. It’s OK to want to focus on the graphic design side of things."
By way of example, Budd recounts a recent trip to a coffee shop. He was approached by a visual designer who wanted to be a UX designer, because he thought that's what you had to do to progress: "I had to talk him down off the ledge. The guy was a fantastic visual designer and so I asked if he saw himself in five years doing wireframes, user research and user testing. He said no, he loved visual design. I said, then don’t become a UX designer!"




6 comments
Comment: 1
Perhaps Mr. Grannell could speak to CD's or others and ascertain why it is that Visual designers get paid so much less then UX'ers? Or maybe what specializations could help them boost themselves into a different league; make them more desirable. Something that helps them? :)
Comment: 2
In terms of remuneration for work, I think any investigation would require an entire separate article; same also for how a visual designer can propel themselves to the next level. (Bear in mind the articles in the news section are insight into current events and not investigative fully fledged features, even if I do rampage over my set word count almost every time.)
Comment: 3
The major harm is done when you try and do it all. I'd call that the start of identity crisis.
Comment: 4
However, while we're on the subject.. I'd suggest that the difference in pay is because your earning power is often a factor, and it's easier to demonstrate financial benefits of testing and interaction design.
For example some A/B testing showing how many extra sign-ups a differently placed button results in is easy for businesses to directly calculate the value of, compared to something like emotional impact which usually has anecdotal qualitative results.
Comment: 5
However, converting is not easy. The UX industry is notoriously difficult to break into, and that applies to seasoned professionals as well as graduates. But above all else, do as Andy suggests, and ask yourself if you really want to move away from Visual design. You'll rarely find a role where you can do it all, and if you do, there's a warning sign there....more on that some other time.
Cheers,
Sean Pook
www.ic-creative.co.uk
Comment: 6
Unfortunately I've found that companies often want to invest in UX because they've heard it's important, and haven't actually decided how it's going to help them specifically and that UX candidates are often poor or unable to actually walk through their added value in terms of ROI.
Thus we have a lot of companies hiring UX designers blindly, creating an imbalance between the number of vacancies and the number of active candidates. It's a UX designers market out there (certainly for perm anyway).
When we say Visual designers we need to highlight we are probably talking about a certain type of visual designer - a rare breed if you like - someone with creative flair and ability and has used this to create compelling UI visuals. Graphic designers and people who colour in buttons are ten-a-penny. Those VD's who can show they can combine the two are the ones that earn as much as their UX design cousins.