Site builder Breezi aims for designers
Online tool provides visual interface for web design
Billing itself as a "website builder for designers and creatives," Breezi recently 'soft launched'. The service combines hosting and a somewhat DTP-style interface that enables you to quickly get a design up and running. Although in some ways akin to other online building tools and consumer-level web software, Breezi is hoping to snare more pro-oriented graphic designers through its emphasis on grids, design savvy and widget-like apps.
We spoke to co-founder Chris Anderson (CA) about the service and his plans for its future.
.net: What was the thinking behind Breezi?
CA: The thinking behind Breezi has always been to give designers one simple, visual interface where they can create and design an amazing-looking website quickly, from start to finish, with pixel-level control. We completely remove abstraction from the process by enabling the designer to edit an actual website as they're viewing it. With everything from customising specific page layouts, to styling very granular design elements, to adding and editing content, you can see the changes take effect on the fly.
.net: How does Breezi differ from existing design tools for web designers?
CA: There are two things that make Breezi very different from other website design tools. First, we respect the design process by giving a number of different grid-based wireframe options as starting points, as opposed to pre-designed templates that constrain and limit the creative process. Customising a few things in a template is not designing a website. We simply give better tools and enable designers to get moving quickly.
The other big difference is Breezi offers a great deal of ultra-fine design controls, without requiring any coding. Not that there's anything wrong with coding, but in many cases a designer needs to move quickly, and coding can slow the process down. The inherent nature of Breezi also makes it ideal for rapid prototyping.
.net: What are your plans in terms of developing and evolving Breezi?
CA: On looking at the steps involved for a designer to create a website, we see a lot of room for improvement through the entire flow. Our goal is to fill more holes in this process, and make it a more efficient and enjoyable experience.
Immediate plans are to add bulk style editing, expand the number of available starting-point options, and refine the interface and usability in a few key areas. Beyond that, we have a long backlog of features and ideas on our product roadmap. But right now we're most interested in hearing from designers who use Breezi, so that the next steps we take are directly informed by feedback we receive from the design community.
Breezi is currently available 'free forever' in an April promotion. Subsequent pricing is to be announced.




9 comments
Comment: 1
I'm not denying that the service is probably great, but with each page coming in at ~3mb, I can't help but think that it could do with some optimisation.
Comment: 2
Comment: 3
** The load time for 90% of our sites are under 2.5 seconds. In the case of derek's site, it is 1.87 seconds. Actually... it loads in 900 ms if you don't count linkedin/facebook load times. You can check it here - http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/g0I5mCnFl/http://tooderek.com/ - Feel free to check others!
** For the font face issue. We're not actually including those 41 fonts. The parser just grabs the ones that it needs. So if you look in derek's site, it's actually just loading the fonts that he is using on his site.
We'll be writing a blog post to follow up since it seems like a lot of people have questions about the way we generate our pages and are getting confused. We'll do a better job communicating how the parsers work.
Thanks,
Navid
Comment: 4
Size Analysis
Size per Content Type
Image 2.0 MB
Script 228.4 kB
Other 121.4 kB
HTML 84.9 kB
CSS 7.9 kB
around 70% is on images, which is expected for a heavily graphic based site.
Comment: 5
The sites showcased on Breezi’s site looked alright, but I too have my concerns about the bloat code. Maybe a future revision of the site can link to .css and .js files? Still bloated, but would at least look cleaner when viewing source code… in a “hide everything in a closet” sort of way. ;)
Otherwise, I’m curious to see how this service evolves. If it helps more designers get a site up quickly (and NOT have it look like GeoCities), then it’s a step in the right direction!
Comment: 6
body {
font-family : Arial;
font-size : -cs-do(cs-rule-property ".theme.font-size" "base");
}
....
so here are some clues about what is going on:
why do we have script tags with the attribute type and a value of text/cs?
yes we have our own type for this
why the content of this scripts look like css?
because those are css processors source
what is this weird font-size : -cs-do(cs-rule-property ".theme.font-size" "base"); "css rule"
have you read about calc or -moz-calc?
we will explain this into more detail in our blog soon.
Comment: 7
That's okay, they're a start up, I understand.
However...today, I tried to log on to Breezi's site and was taken immediately to a screen requiring that I download Firefox, Google Chrome or Apples (sorry the name escapes me at present) browser. I haven't used Apple's new browser, however, after using Firefox and Google Chrome in the past, I've had nothing but problems with those browsers noticeably slowing my pc down. I haven't even had a chance to use Breezi, and because of this requirement, which I refuse to utilize, I guess I won't be trying it. Best wishes to Breezi users, I mean that sincerely.
Comment: 8
We respond to every single inquiry everyday. If you are having issues, contact us asap at hi@breezi.com
Thanks
Comment: 9
Weebly/yola too generic little flexibility.
I don't know css or HTML, so as a small business owner the best medium of both worlds for me was easywebcontent.com Site Builder. Simple starting point and fully flexibility over my layout without the coding part.
Everyone is different so some tools work great for some and not for others; for me it was Easy Webcontent.