Dev says: Stop banging on about IE6

Enough already, says Remy Sharp: support IE6 or don't. But just stop going on about how it should die

Dev says: Stop banging on about IE6
Dev says: Stop banging on about IE6
Remy Sharp
Remy Sharp would like devs to stop moaning about IE6, because the argument is moot

In an article that might be interpreted as more than a little angry and sarcastic by anyone who has powers of reading and comprehension, developer Remy Sharp has expressed the wish that everyone would just shut the hell up about why IE6 should die.

What do you mean, you don’t like IE6? Really? argues that designers should stop posting about why they won’t support IE6 and either get on with doing so or just stop. “We all know IE6 should die. Microsoft knows IE6 should die. Heck, even IE6 knows it needs to die. It’s been walking around like a fucking zombie for years,” he says. “While we’re at it, when IE6 does eventually die, who’s going to do the find and replace on all the blog posts from 'IE6' to 'IE7', then 'IE7' to 'IE8'?” asks Sharp, who, presumably, was banging his head against the desk in despair at this point, while trying hard to type.

Sharp tells .net he was tipped over the edge after reading a post by a young developer explaining why he doesn't support IE6, but he says that's not what drove the content of the blog post.

“I wrote it in response to the years of seeing articles, hearing about websites, online petitions and conference speakers telling us that IE6 must die,” he says. “It’s not new news. We all know IE6 must die, but there's the simple fact that IE6 is part of the job for many people.”

Sharp notes that many clients simply don’t have any choice in supporting the ageing browser, and that designers should either suck it up (and, if they like, charge more for supporting obsolete technology) or just get out of the way and let someone else do so. “Why folk don't support IE6 is old news. Trying to justify it to yourself or others is just a way of deflecting the fact that you're not up to the job,” he adds.

Sharp also thinks some developers are putting their own well-being and convenience above the needs of their clients in claiming they won’t support IE6 under any circumstances: “It’s not the right approach to say you won’t support a browser. The developer can justify why a client shouldn't support a browser, but ultimately it's not our call. If the client loves IE6 and only uses that browser, then if you want the work, you’re going to have to support it”.

Sharp suggests developers do more to find out about a client’s traffic before coming to any conclusion, and argues that poor browsers can even be an opportunity to sharpen skills.

“Often, I find clients want to support IE6 without even knowing what their traffic is like or what the usage is. It's often just a gut feeling. If that's the case, I simply quote separately for IE6 support, so the client can make the decision, which is much easier when there’s an associated cost,” he says. “And knowing about and dealing with browser quirks are two of the things that make a developer good at their job.”

8 comments

Comment: 1

I totally agree. I stopped supporting Internet Explorer 6 a long time ago. I've told no one unless they've asked me.

Comment: 2

So an article moaning about banging on about people saying IE6 must die mentions several times that IE6 must die.

Comment: 3

I think it's spot on, because it's a futile argument. You don't see mechanics saying they simply won't service that old 1990 Ford Fiesta because it can be a pain in the backside, they just charge appropriately.

The issue with all the IE6 whining is not that it's wrong, but that it's futile. As Remy says, some people don't have a choice about IE6, and some people do have a choice but want that choice. It's highly pretentious of us in our profession to try and claim what we will and won't support that is a perfectly valid (if not sensible) consumer choice.

And when IE6 does die, we'll have the same arguments again about IE7, and then IE8. There may even be those that are unable to upgrade from older Firefox browsers due to Mozilla's policy with regards to new versions of the Mac OSX!

It's time we started acting like professionals, suck it up :)

Comment: 4

IE6 is old news. What actually bothers me a little is seeing recent browsers that aren't behaving accordingly with each other, Google Chrome is appreciated by many (and myself as a user) but in a developers point of view i think it's a bad browser when it comes to render things like the other browsers, i use firefox as my default browser for developing and nowadays even ie9 is getting similar results than chrome and we don't even have a to fix it.

Comment: 5

Nice one! I think that I don't have to say how much I dislike IE6, but I nevertheless try to provide a version of the website that is basically still usable for this outdated browser. Like Remy says, nobody still uses IE6 voluntarily - they have to use it because the IT is too lazy (or a replacement costs too much, whatever). And why should I punish these people? Of course it often is a pain to develop for it, but that's our job, face. And our job has never been easy and will never be.

Comment: 6

Check your analytics - if a fair percentage your visitors are using IE6 - support it. It's not up to devs to tell people what browsers to use.

Comment: 7

IE6 is already dead, but you are still banging about it.

Comment: 8

IE6 only has a 2.3% market share in the western world, so in my books, that's already dead. Now I think it's time to start ranting on about IE7 or simply IE in general. Firefox and Safari are the industry leading browsers and have nearly a 75% combined share.
June issue on sale now!

The Week in Web Design

Sign up to our 'Week in Web Design' newsletter!

Hosting Directory
.net digital edition
Treat yourself to our geeky merchandise!
site stat collection