The top 10 SEO myths
Search marketing consultant Mark Buckingham destroys his 10 favourite search engine optimisation myths and asks leading experts such as Google's Matt Cutts and Search Engine Land's Matt McGee for their opinion
Chances are, if you're reading this, you've dabbled with SEO to varying levels of success; from minor frustration to Google gratification. Whatever your experience, myths still abound the oft-laboured carousel of search engine optimisation: at its best, a well planned, ongoing strategy in the pursuit of visibility and primed accessibility, underpinning, informing and complimenting exemplary design usability and content. At its worst, a dark art, misunderstood, an unwieldy afterthought, a quick fix that did you more harm than good.
For truly effective SEO, working in tandem with good design, content creation and general business practice; look beyond the dashboard for the route to success.
Let's look at 10 of my personal perennial favourite SEO myths.
1. Satisfaction, guaranteed
Let's start with the bedrock of search marketing: there is really no such thing as guaranteed rankings when it comes to organic, or natural search results. Any company or specialist proffering such should be treated warily; ask whether they're referring specifically to organic search terms or paid search? Whilst is possible to speculate on long tail niche keywords searches, for all but the most niche key terms, results will vary and can take weeks, if not months. A good search marketer will set realistic expectations, using SEO to prime all areas of your website and content, rather than offer empty promises.
There are one or two hundred factors that influence your ranking with the search engines - no company or individual can control all of these.
SEO might be best achieved with great skill, but there are myriad external factors, dependent on the success of your products or services, not to mention a slice of luck, involved with determining whether or not you get visibility on the internet mantelpiece.
Search Engine Land's executive news editor, Matt McGee says: "The only way to even possibly come close to guaranteeing rankings is if you're doing it on the paid side and happen to have a term that you're willing to bid high enough on and to get high enough clickthrough to sustain top spot. Also, personalisation comes into play: what you see might be different to what I see, so there's absolutely no way to guarantee a number one ranking on Google".
2. A high Google PageRank = high ranking
Despite popular belief, Google PageRank does not equal your ranking. The idea that a high PR means you're going to rank across the board for everything is a myth. "For certain keywords a lower PR page might outrank a higher PR page, but the rankings don't specifically go in exact PR order", says Matt McGee. Having a high PageRank is nice but it doesn't automatically mean high rankings for everything, and it certainly doesn't automatically mean you're going to get tons of traffic and sales.
McGee adds: "It's still often seen as the number one factor in Google's algorithm when it's actually one of a couple of hundred factors. It's a very visible symbol for a lot of webmasters and business owners, but the more time you spend in the search world, the sooner you realise it's not the be-all and end-all."
3. Endorsed by Google
Put simply, if you're dealing with a firm who make any allusion that they're "endorsed" or "approved" by Google for optimisation purposes, it's likely they're a fraud. The reality is that Google does not endorse any SEO company. They do have Analytics and AdWords certification, so providers in these areas can take tests for accreditation. "Google definitely does not put their stamp of approval on any individual consultant or company", affirms Matt McGee.
Personally, I'm not opposed to the idea of some accreditation or regulatory standards, given this very subject matter, and unregulated nature of the search world, but I just can't see it happening any time soon. Google's Webmaster Guidelines and its beginners guide to SEO, as well as various esteemed resources on the web, should be consulted when undertaking any SEO or hiring a professional, but many professionals cite that what they teach you is very vanilla. McGee adds: "It gets you in the door but it's not always going to be everything that you need."
4. Meta tag keywords matter
A perennial favourite myth is probably the keywords meta tag. Google's head of Webspam and all-round search sage, Matt Cutts, says: "Google doesn't use the keywords meta tag in our scoring at all. It's just a waste of time to throw a lot of phrases into the keywords meta tag. It would be a better use of your effort to do things like speed up your website, because that can directly improve the usability of your site even independently of SEO." Meta tag descriptions, and certainly titles matter, but it's true the keyword tag is generally completely redundant across the board.
David Mihm, president of GetListed.org, agrees: "'Can you help me optimise my meta keywords?' This is probably the number one phrase I hear from small business owners who call and want me to help them with website optimisation. The fact is that no search engine uses them any more. Google, which rarely discloses ANYTHING important about its algorithm, formally declared it does not use meta keywords via its search quality guru Matt Cutts nearly two years ago. The two 'metas' that site owners should still worry about are including keywords in the <title> tag (extremely important for optimisation), and the meta description, which, although it does not seem to affect ranking, can be used to increase clickthrough rates from the search result pages."
5. Cheat your way to the top
Attempting to tricking Google, Bing, et al, and trying to manipulate search results is a bad idea, and even if you succeed, if and when the search engines discover your site’s deception, you risk your site will be removed from the index, with potentially disastrous business consequences.
It's arguable that Google et al might miss the odd page with a few sneaky invisible keywords; after all, this might be the work of an errant (but potentially well meaning) assistant and not your own work. But a trend or consistency of black-hat SEO is likely to do you much more harm than good as the search engines get better and better at sniffing out sites, from dubious redirects to affiliate link farms, that simply don't deserve to be there.
The basic adage is, if it works for the user, it's likely to have a place on Google; how far up you climb is dependent on myriad of factors, and those sites that cheat aren't just risking their credibility, but usually reek of over-optimisation, which in some cases can be a by-product of a site that was never really designed to please its audience first and foremost. Being gung-ho in your quest for high rakings at the expense of your content is nearly always a futile process.
6. Keywords? Cram 'em in
The notion that keywords that every page needs a certain percentage of time to outrank the competition is a fallacy. Says Matt McGee: "I've always said you do have to use the keywords, you need to have pages that talk about the products and services you sell. There's no perfect number: it's not that if you mention the keyword seven times on this page I'm automatically going to rank well. It doesn't work that way: there are so many other factors and a page that gets a lot of inbound links with the right anchor text can rank for terms that don't even appear on the page. The notion that there's a perfect percentage for keywords simply isn't true. "
Furthermore, your copy should be persuasive, informative and punchy: you'll only serve to limit your copy's punch by simply clawing keywords into the text. Be verbose, create opportunities to talk about your company, products and niche verticals, but never, repetitive.
David Mihm: "It's a myth to say 'I will optimise your website’s Keyword Density'. It is important to include keywords on your pages but there is NO 'magic number' of times to use a keyword. Write your text for humans!"
7. Spending money on Google AdWords boosts your rankings
The assumption that spending money on AdWords will somehow engender you to Google and thus advantage your organic search listings is an understandable, but untrue, belief. Google has said so many times over the years, but the myth never seems to go away.
It's no mistake, however, to identify some correlation between targeted ad spend and your site's organic coverage. Search expert Matt McGee, says: "I've seen studies over the years that suggest that when you have good visibility on both your paid and organic it increases clickthrough on your pages, and thus traffic, increasing awareness, which leads more to links, etc, etc. So I certainly think there's nothing wrong with spending money on AdWords. But it's a definitely a myth that there's a direct impact on your rankings."
8. Land here
Every page on your site should be treated as potential landing page; you can't assume a visitor is going to land on your homepage or your products overview page. The idea that you have one special search landing page is not helpful. All pages are possible landing pages.
9. Set it and forget it
It’s true that continually jostling for higher rankings, making incessant iterations and tweaking, doesn’t give you time to sit back and monitor the success of your hard work and can be a fruitless process. However, it's also unadvisable to go to the other extreme and assume SEO is a 'one off' project. Good SEO never really ends, much like a successful company wouldn't settle with just one single marketing investment.
If you think you've achieved all your SEO, I'll bet you're not making the most of your website and your offline marketing activities. There's always more that can be done, and even if your rankings don't immediately benefit, your site will. Even with limited resources, even adding or improving a single page every month is better than leaving a static site to flounder, which may, in time, be superseded by your competition and afforded less 'currency' by your users and engines alike.
10. Rankings aren't the only fruit
A lot of people come in to SEO thinking that the end goal is to get rankings; but the end goal is to make money. "If a number one ranking for a certain keyword isn't making you money, it's worthless. If a number three or number four ranking is getting you clicks, you're converting your traffic into customers, then that ranking is much more valuable," says Matt McGee.
This is my favourite myth of all. Being on top is great, but, in my opinion, it isn't the be-all and end-all and it won't necessarily yield your site maximum conversions. Naturally you need prominence, but it's the quality of the site and your content that also matters. I'd wager a site in fourth place on the first page, above the fold, that fulfils the visitors' requirements is, by and large, going to be more successful than one that belies its pole position through lacklustre content, relying more on inbound links and other good fortune to supplant its superior competition.
What really matters is the speed, depth and richness of the content you deliver, and where your audience buys into it, you, your brand, services, or products, and how consistent that message is across the web and in the real world. SEO should be a laboured but fluid process, priming your good work and ensuring it's tweaked, organically, for maximum accessibility; not just an afterthought. Good SEO is about putting your best foot forwards and continually developing the site to be simply as good as it can be. Place your visitors first, and the search engines will follow.
Remember, rankings are a means to an end, they are not the end itself.




40 comments
Comment: 1
When I graduated college my diploma project was about web crawlers. I completely ignored keyword tags because it was more relevant to get the crawling algorithm to determine which keywords are most important on that page.
It's also true what you are saying about Google Adsense. If don't choose well your words in the ads are some chances that the ad won't show up at all.
I'm not sure about point 2. Didn't made some test for this but I know that this was the primary way to determine rankings when Google was launch, but maybe I'm wrong.
George
Comment: 2
SEO in general encompasses a lot of disciplines. Chances are, as developers, we're probably not that good at writing great content, link building, or even analyzing site data. But our skill sets can lend to improving a site organically in concert with these other efforts. Things like cutting down site load time, coding pages in ways that make sense to search engines, addressing items like XML sitemaps and robots.txt, and just continued optimization in general, all these things make a difference.
Educating ourselves on everything about SEO definitely isn't necessary, but if we can have a good understanding of principles applicable to what we do (and to also know what isn't true about SEO, such as myths as listed above), we can make considerable contributions.
Comment: 3
Comment: 4
Comment: 5
Glad you like the article.
Comment: 6
Comment: 7
But still, a useful article, even the obvious needs reinforcing from time to time!
Comment: 8
I find somewhere between 5-10% and less than 15 instances is safe. I've found fixing this alone can make a big improvement to rankings and traffic.
Comment: 9
Comment: 10
Comment: 11
Comment: 12
Comment: 13
Comment: 14
Comment: 15
The exception to the rule is when a HomePage is competing for a keyword. One can easily find examples of HomePages with PR0 having top page positioning on Google for medium difficulty keywords such as a profession in a small town. Google is all about authority and must be giving a boost in effective PageRank to HomePages competing for keywords. The boost is up to PR5.
I agree that the idea that a high PR means you're going to rank across the board for everything is a myth. One has to look at it the other way round. The lower the HomePage PR of a website the smaller the cohort of keywords that it can have any chance of successfully competing for top page positioning.
A newly indexed website has a HomePage PR of 0. It will only be able to compete for keywords with HPR-KD of 4.3 or less. The HomePage PageRank keyword difficulty (HPR-KD) on a specific Google domain (Google.com., Google.co.uk etc.) is calculated by finding the HomePage PageRank of each of the top 10 web pages for the keyword including the #2 Google factor (boost for homepages). The HPR-KD is the average value of the top 10 web pages for the keyword.
Comment: 16
Comment: 17
Comment: 18
Comment: 19
My theory is evidence based and easily verifiable.
The evidence is discussed in Ezinearticles e.g.
"PageRank is the Best Indicator of Competition Strength For a Keyword in SEO - New Verifiable Theory"
and "Google Panda and PageRank Updates: Top Two Ranking Factors in SEO Unchanged" which discusses "HPR-KD"
You can test it out with a spreadsheet for any keyword and Google domain you choose.
Find the #1 web page and enter its PageRank. Right column (URL) - Cell O3
Enter the HomePage PageRank in the corresponding cell C3
If the webpage is a HomePage, boost the effective HomePage PageRank to 5 - Cell C3
Repeat for the top 10 web pages for each of your keywords.
For Keyword 1 average the URL PageRanks and enter the result in Cell N3
And average the results for the HomePages and enter the result in Cell B3
Repeat the above for further keywords.
I would be more than intersted to learn how you get on.
Regards
David
Comment: 20
i disagree with number 4 - Meta tag keywords matter
Google does not count it, but Google is not the only search engine.
Too many SEO companies abused the meta tag keywords and now it does not matter.
it is valid to invest 1 minute and add the meta tag keywords.
In the future, if any search engine starts to use it, we will have to go back to all the pages and write it.
Bottom line,
do not do it for SEO. do it for the future
Comment: 21
David - sounds interesting but still not sold, I'll give it a whirl (if and when I can find the time!)
Comment: 22
Comment: 23
The Meta Keywords tag does mater for quite a few of the (non-Google) site search tools so it's never a bad idea to include them. If a site gets large enough to use site search going back to add them can be a pain. I wouldn't spend more than a couple minutes with it but what does it hurt to look at a page and drop in the keywords. Just like the description tag, it does not not help in rankings but it's still useful for other reasons.
Comment: 24
A great read with respected and reputable sources!
Comment: 25
I think its a bit hit and miss in regards to the keywords meta tag, it has been stated that Google do not acknowledge it but what about other search engines such as Bing and Yahoo?
I have kept Meta Keywords in place for small sites and locally targeted sites, however for any large and (inter)national websites then I have started removing these. The main reason being is that competitors can have a quick look to see all your target keywords and keyphrases which is obviously not good.
I have had numerous clients who have been duped into signing up for SEO and one-off packages from these so called "Google Partners". Many of them didn't even do anything other than change the Meta tags, its a shame as it gives a bad name to the rest of the SEO industry.
I do sometimes feel that the business brings it upon themselves though. We have had quite a few customer queries about our SEO services thinking it will solve a failing website. Upon taking a 2 minute review of the website it is clear that there is a lot more important factors than just poor search engine performance.
SEO is no longer a technique of optimising website elements, its about keyword research, content creation, site accessibility, link building, social networks and a lot more
Comment: 26
Hopefully I'll get around to writing a part 2 soon! : )
p.s It's amazing how meta keywords have got so much coverage. They're incidental crumbs. really nothing more folks. Don't go out your way to add them, it makes not a jot of difference IMHO.
Cheers
Mark
Comment: 27
Cheers
Mark
Comment: 28
What I mentioned would normally be classed as strategies, its not something you can change quickly like a meta tag.
If you want more SEO myths then I would look at Stephan Spencers article - http://searchengineland.com/36-seo-myths-that-wont-die-but-need-to-40076
or his follow up post - http://searchengineland.com/36-more-seo-myths-that-wont-die-but-need-to-...
Comment: 29
I've always used keywords in my titles but i didn't know that the meta tag keyword has no value anymore...
Thank you for this article...
Comment: 30
I agree with everything except #4 in part. I wish Matt Cutts had never done that video. The actual quote: "Google doesn't use the keywords meta tag in our scoring at all." is where the focus should be. Does it mean they do not use Meta Keywords?
No.
It means they do not use them in "scoring". There has been some discussion that they are still used as secondary validator for keywords in page content. Yet some people are eliminating them all together. Not a wise move...modest use is advisable. It's not that difficult. Yes they have been abused. Have the other search engines followed Google's lead? I've heard nothing definitive on it.
Also, because of this statement I continually hear the phrase: "Google does not use keywords" which is an entirely false and makes me crazy. it shows people do not have a clear understanding of the industry (and in some cases lack a clear understanding of the English language!)
Comment: 31
Target highly product keywords in search engine
Increase Sales ratio
Increase site visibility
Enhance traffic of site
Increase you site revenue
seo services uk
Comment: 32
I think this information about top 10 SEO may helps to improve the knowledge about the seo techniques and its advantages.Thanks for the information.
seo services
Comment: 33
Also, what we all need to bear in mind is that SEO and Google rankings are the culmination of a lot of factors some of which outweigh others, i try and think of things as a blend of factors, big website v small, age domain v new domain, backlinks v no links, updated content v old stagnant data, bottom line is take each client on its merits and review against the competition.
Comment: 34
Comment: 35
I must say that these needs to be understand & should be taken care while SEO'ing ones website.
Quality Contents, Good Link Building (Quality Not Quantity) can help i suppose.
Comment: 36
Comment: 37
Comment: 38
I agree with your 4th point (Meta tag keywords matter) I would like to say that I have read some were that Google search engine is much smarter than human & counting keywords from the content for the phrase. Now the question is about why should I have to write content with keywords? I can write content with words targeted such as keyword.....(content) keyword....(content) keyword....(content)
Wow factor is "Google gives rank from ad words" this is very debating & undefined topic which I don't like to explain so much because I have never tested it but if and else is always there & I would like to find out.
Thanks,
Arun Nair
Comment: 39
Comment: 40