Big question: should we drop social media buttons?

Big question: should we drop social media buttons?

Our experts ponder giving all those buttons the heave-ho

In a recent article Oliver Reichenstein argued that social media buttons create clutter and don’t really boost traffic. We asked our panel of experts for their views

Whitney Hess

Whitney Hess
UX designer
whitneyhess.com

There is no single answer for “should we do this or should we do that”. The decisions we make about our designs should be informed by the attitudes, motivations and behaviours of our target audiences. If they are heavy social media users and the flair helps to legitimise the business for them, then it’s worth having even if they aren’t ‘used’. If the target audience doesn’t tend to interact with brands via social media and the business success doesn’t rely on those channels for communication, then you can’t justify keeping them. Either way, the decision should be supported by business goals and user needs, not just some set of arbitrary ‘best practices’ or an esteemed designer’s opinion.

Whitney is an independent user experience designer
 

Chris Coyier

Chris Coyier
Web designer
chriscoyier.net

I’ve gone back and forth on this on CSS-Tricks. I used to not have them at all for many of the same reasons Oliver suggests. Then later I changed my mind. My reasons were: I thought I might be missing out on traffic generated from them, I personally enjoy clicking those buttons, adding them in a performance-responsible way was an interesting challenge, and the web is an ongoing experiment; nothing is forever. I’m on the verge of doing a new version of the site and I’m leaning towards removing them again.

Chris is a web designer working at Wufoo
 

Elliot Jay Stocks

Elliot Jay Stocks
Designer
elliotjaystocks.com

It’s very easy to feel that you need social media buttons, but I agree with Oliver’s point that if people want to share, they will share without needing buttons as a prompt.

And for those who can’t be bothered to do that, perhaps they would be meaningless shares anyway. I’ve followed Oliver’s advice and removed the ‘Tweet’ button from my own site.

See our interview with Elliot in issue 231 of .net, on sale now
 

Omar Martinez

Omar Martinez
Lead technologist
Agencynet.com

I strongly support getting rid of the social media buttons. The desired purpose of the buttons is to easily bring the article or page to the masses with one click. But in reality, if people really want to share an article, they can simply copy and paste the link and share it in the network that they feel most people will benefit from it.

On the mobile version of sites, I have mixed feelings about social media buttons. The mobile experience is digested more rapidly; providing the buttons makes it easier to share an article and not have the user jump through hoops. But right now Apple is doing a great job with Twitter integration with iOS 5 and Facebook integration in iOS 6, which makes social media buttons on websites obsolete.

Omar is the lead technologist at Agencynet
 

Rachel Shillcock

Rachel Shillcock
Freelance web designer
www.rachil.li

On the past few sites that I’ve worked on, including social media buttons seems to have been quite a high priority. However, on one site I noticed how much this affected the loading time – it literally added an extra second or two.

In my eyes, social media buttons are quite highly requested by clients because they think it’s necessary to push all of their social networks at once. I think we need to take a step back and instead of just automatically adding them in to a site, ask ourselves why we’re putting them there and what use case we think we have for their inclusion.

Smashing Magazine tweeted recently saying how taking the social media buttons off its own site had not only caused the site speed to increase by a massive volume, but it somehow caused more people to share their articles than had done so when the buttons were in place on the site. This just shows how, if a reader really wants to share what you have said and connects with it, they will make the effort to do so – social media buttons or not.

Rachel Shillcock is a freelance web designer
 

Anna Dahlstrom

Anna Dahlstrom
Freelance UX designer
annadahlstrom.com

In the early days of social media these buttons were great for driving awareness around how users could share your content. Today the users who want to share your content will do so whether you have a button or not.


Going forwards we won’t be able to have a button for each network we want users to talk about us on. And we shouldn’t. The focus should be on the message or products we want to get across and ensuring the content is worth sharing – not on adding as many share buttons as possible. Though the count in the share buttons do give some indication of activity, it’s not a true representation and I hope we’ll move to better ways of showing this in the future.

Anna is a freelance user experience designer
 

Rob Walker

Rob Walker
Managing director
xcitedigital.com

Social media buttons seem to do a great job of promoting the websites they link to – I wish I had a button linking to my corporate site all over the internet.

This question is a bit of quandary for me as I do occasionally press the Twitter sharing button on the BBC website – so they do work – and I would much prefer to press the button rather than copy the link into Twitter and share it that way.

The proliferation of the buttons devalues them though, and makes users skim over content like adverts. We (users) get very good at selecting the relevant content and avoiding everything else so they do seem like clutter in that sense, but they’re not pointless and do generate traffic – albeit less and less.

It would make sense to have the facility to share items in a single standard place on the web page you’re on, so you can share if you want to rather than share at will in a spam-like fashion. This could be incorporated into the footer, or could be added to the browser as an app making the process of sharing easier.

Rob is managing director at Xcite Digital
 

Aaron Gustafson

Aaron Gustafson
Principal
easy-designs.net

I don’t think social media icons are bad in and of themselves, but I think our strategy toward them needs to change.

In many instances, there is no context given for why a user should want to interact with a given brand via social media. We can address this by providing users with a value proposition for following. For instance, if you are in the investing space, you might say preface your button placement with a statement like ‘Follow us to learn more about personal investing’. Providing that sort of context can help establish appropriate expectations for your visitors as to how following you will benefit them.

If you have the room for it in your design, you might also consider including a recent tweet or rotation of tweets (perhaps curated or at least filtered to remove things like @ replies) that backs up your value proposition.

Aaron is principal at Easy! Designs
 

Trent Walton

Trent Walton
Founder of Paravel
paravelinc.com

I’ve always thought that peppering websites with social media buttons makes them look a little like the sponsor logo-packed fender of a NASCAR racing car. Oliver says that “social media buttons are not a social media strategy”, and I think that’s spot-on. Vitaly Friedman’s tweet on the removal of Facebook Like buttons resulting in increased sharing is even more reason for businesses and websites to test this theory for themselves.

There’s definitely something to be said for the utility of sharing buttons, but if the end result of removing them is quicker page loads and deeper user engagement, then maybe it’s time to reevaluate what we’re doing there.

Trent is founder of Paravel
 

Jonathan Smiley

Jonathan Smiley
Designer
zurb.com

It’s interesting to be advocating removing these quick share tools, even as Apple adds their equivalent throughout the Mac OS and iOS 6.

I think the real killer for these on the web is simply speed – they brutally damage page load, especially on a mobile device that might have a slower, higher-latency connection. They can help establish trust, and they do (sometimes) get used, so dropping them entirely might not be ideal. We’ve seen success in the past creating links right over to the service’s share URLs rather than embedded widgets.

Jonathan is a design lead at ZURB

19 comments

Comment: 1

All very valid arguments, however social media buttons isn't just about making it easy for your readers to share your content (and to remind them to do that), but it's also social proof. If you read an article that has 1k+ tweets and likes, you know that all of those people found that article useful enough to share it with their friends.

I do however wish that the load times were smaller.

Also, some of the social networks are making it easier to share content through your browser instead of the web page, so soon there might not be a need for social buttons anyway!

Comment: 3

One of the ways which I get around the speed/load issue is by having them trigger asynchronously on click or on hover, whichever is most appropriate for the user experience.

Personally, I think social needs to be integrated in a much more thoughtful way rather than just sticking share buttons everywhere. Unfortunately many commercial people see them as a quick win to promote their site for free.

Comment: 4

A few months ago we made the decision to introduce social media buttons at h2g2. We limited them to Facebook, Twitter and G+, and to only those pages we wanted people to share.

We've been watching the effects closely since they went in, and I think it's fair to say that they are definitely not the be all and end all of getting traffic to your site.

The number of times they've been clicked really is far less than you'd expect. It could well be the nature of the site, with the majority of our visitors coming in to one article, occasionally reading a second, but then usualy heading off. But the number of clicks with these buttons in minimal compared to the page hits.

Having said that however, when they are clicked they have led to desirable results. Each click has resulted in a few more visits, and we have gained membership from some of those.

But the number of clicks per page views really is minimal, and the time spent considering, planning and implementing these sharing buttons could possibly have been better spent.

Comment: 5

All valid points. My clients also see social media as a huge value and as a tool to communicate with their client/customer base. I started using iconic which are text base icons to help with loading speed. It has helped.

Comment: 7

For faster load – you can load the js libraries at the bottom (asynchronously) and write a function for render the buttons after the dom ready, with a little delay

Comment: 8

Right tool right job people... come on. Social Media Buttons have a job to do, they allow people to socially share content - should we bring back the 'email-a-friend' button did it ever go away?

Sensible correct use of Social Media Buttons has to be recommended to allow website owners to gain the most benefit. So my answer is no - don't get rid of them, but perhaps put a bit of though into how you use them and where they fit in (and how big you need them to be).

Comment: 9

The only times I have clicked a social media button is for my own benefit: I click the +1 button so it is preserved for me. Maybe this is "doing it wrong" but I use it as a "add to favourite" / "read later" functionality, not to spam any and all that might be following me. If I want to publicise something I copy/paste links into a twitter client / window.

I don't even do +1's any more as I use Pocket...

Comment: 10

To add to Omar Martinez's input. Android has a very well integrated sharing feature as well that further proves that social icons on mobile is a waste of space.

Comment: 11

Yes we should. Most mobile devices have native sharing and desktop browsers should too. Mozilla are developing the Firefox Share addon (not sure how actively). Windows 8 has sharing charms and I think the next OSX has some type of sharing too. Ideally the sharing needs to be open enough to allow you to add whichever networks you want. I think it's much better in the browser/OS as it's always in a familiar location, they are responsible for maintaining it and it's less to download from websites.

When making sites I often ditch all the icons and have a share link as text that flies open to reveal the networks. It's unobtrusive and easily to add more items too without breaking a design,

Comment: 12

@hillsrobin Windows Phone has excellent sharing too, Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook etc. It's a very 'social enabled' OS. Just got a tiny market share.

Comment: 13

For desktop browsers, I share always using the addthis-Plugin only. In the medium-term, share buttons within layouts are obsolete because of serious performance issues and negative impacts on clean UI-Design. A global OS-Sharing Solution on all devices including desktop would be perfect to fix the current sharing problem. In the long-term, I think, this will be it.

Comment: 14

These are all good points, but I disagree to a certain extent with Omar Martinez' comment that "if people really want to share an article, they can simply copy and paste the link..." My mom emailed me this morning asking how she can post a link to a video on Facebook that she found on a website that didn't have a Facebook Share link. She had no idea that she could just copy and paste the link into a status update to perform the same action. You really have to keep your users and audience in mind, and remember that some people have gotten dependent on the automatic sharing buttons and haven't been using social media long enough to know that copy/paste is an option.

Comment: 15

Everybody has their opinions on social networking (sharing) buttons but one thing we can all agree on is that they slow down loading times.

What we need to remember is that the solution isn't one size fits all, wether we have sharing buttons on a website all depends on the users. And by this I mean the level of user.

For people like us (let's class us as expert users), we are online all the time and sharing posts and articles through social networking regularly, and if we really want to share something we are fully aware of how to do this without the need for social networking buttons.

For the average web user the buttons are the only way they know how to share articles, blog posts, and products. 

So yes we can remove the buttons on some sites and still see content being shared, but in general the buttons need to stay as this is the only way a user knows how to share content.

Comment: 16

Ironically, all but one of these designers has links to social media accounts from their sites.

Comment: 17

I personally share links all the time! Mostly on Twitter and hardly on Facebook or any other social media sites. Reason: I like to use Twitter as my archive of good links and share them with my followers. I visit popular web design, development blogs all the time and also use apps like Flipboard, Pulse, Google Reader and use the share buttons frequently. It is really convenient for me and I’m sure, for most of you too!

What most of the designers have argued about in here is that if any user really likes something on the web to share, they will do it anyway. To quote the same by Rachel, “if a reader really wants to share what you have said and connects with it, they will make the effort to do so”.

Recently, an important approach for web designers is the Mobile first approach. So, on one hand we are claiming that we should build everything for the mobile user first and gradually scale it up for desktops and cinema displays, may be, and on the other hand, we are suggesting that the same mobile users should tap on the URL bar, select all, copy, switch to the social media app, create new post/ update, tap, paste and then share? Makes sense? Not to me.

I agree on most of the factors that have been discussed there – for e.g. clients forcefully adding them, anticipating magical numbers on the share links, using buttons to insert ads between them and the content. But that doesn’t really seem to be a well thought of reason to dump the buttons.

I have a solution proposal and this goes for all web designers or site owners:

Why not research and analyze your viewers? See what they are using the most amongst the buttons to share your articles. May be they are subscribing to it via RSS readers and using the app’s share button to post on Social Media sites. May be they are not using Google Plus as much as they are using Facebook Like button or Tweet button. These will help you get rid of the excess lot of buttons that are just there. May be you just need one Tweet button because that’s what your users are considering to share the content and not the rest.

We here, as web designers, are doing the job of both making the life of users easier while educating them about the best ways to use it. I stand for selective and few Social Media Buttons; I agree on that. But having to make the user copy and paste is a strict NO NO.

Comment: 18

I'm surprised at the amount of people saying we should get rid of social media buttons. I think the problem with these buttons isn't the buttons themselves (nor the idea behind them) but rather that they're poorly implemented. They're treated as little more than an afterthought, the result of a 2 minute cut and paste job.

Instead of just tacking on the buttons at the bottom of every page, how about giving them some context, perhaps prefacing them with a personal message to visitors about how sharing the word would help you spread the word.

I've expanded a bit more with an example on my blog:

http://www.picnet.com.au/blogs/met/post/2012/08/15/social-media-buttons/

Comment: 19

I see quite a few site now implementing loading the media buttons on hover or click, I think this method is clunky, sites like http://kohrus.com have a better implementation of social buttons that don't bork page load times.
August issue on sale now!

The Week in Web Design

Sign up to our 'Week in Web Design' newsletter!

Hosting Directory
.net digital edition
Treat yourself to our geeky merchandise!
site stat collection